Ordinance for Legal Acquisition Reforms will increase 'Political Risks'
The Government of India on Monday (29.12.2014)
approved an ordinance to amend the Land Acquisition Act to remove barriers in a
range of sectors like power, housing and defense to kick-start stalled
projects.
At a news briefing, finance minister Arun Jaitley said
the five areas were clearance for land for defense purposes, rural
infrastructure, affordable housing and housing projects for poor, industrial
corridors, and infrastructure or social infrastructure projects, including
those in public-private projects in which ownership of land will remain with
the government.
Mr. Jaitley said while the compensation will remain high
as per the act, and rehabilitation and resettlement will be followed, the
procedure for acquiring land for these projects will be easier by omitting
steps like social impact assessment, impact on food security, and consent of 80
per cent land owners, among other features of the act
Why consensus is important for Investment?
Purpose of Parliamentary democracy is develop
consensus on various issues and then make suitable laws or suitable amendments
in the exist laws based on broad base consensus.
Ordinance should be used only in case of emergencies
to meet situations which has emerged due to unforeseen situation and can create
threat to nation security or public life.
The current trend to bring legal amendments is sending
wrong signal to all the concerned citizens. When livelihood of people is at
stake and laws are amended through ordinances for the benefit of investments or
industrial houses will lead to wrong trends.
Now, in this situation, what is the difference between
India and China? Please read how dictators in middle east and Africa make rules?
I understand ruling establishments may be keen to show
the investments on ground in hurry, but is this the only way?
If government has all convincing arguments and all
state governments are on broad, why special session of Parliament is not called
to discuss all these urgent bills? Is this necessary to have holidays when
national interest is at stake?
The argument will be opposition will not support the
bills. It is true and understandable. It means opposition feels public opinion
is not favor government move. In that case why political leaders of ruling
combination can't organize rallies and go for massive debate son TV channels to
educate the citizens of India about the merits of the amendments.
This will bring all views in public forums and public
opinion will decide which way political parties have to behave.
In order to save time and going through Ordinance
route will undermine the credibility of democratic political process of India.
Who will stop new government from bringing out
ordinance to nullify any particular decision taken by this government through
ordinance route?
Can current political leadership oppose the ordinance
route in future?
Citizens believe that current ruling Government of
India is pro-development but no one wants that it should be through
undemocratic means. This will reduce the biggest strength to serious invest
risk.
Even if intentions are good, but if process is wrong this reduces the legitimacy of the good work done.
This will hurt India forever, because it will be easy
for any future government to follow the bad precedence.
This will add to political risk for large investments.
This will add uncertainties for future projects. Is this good for India and Indian democracy?
It will be interesting to see how many Foreign companies will line up for investment once ordinance is passes but before amendments to law is passed by the Parliament?
My Suggestion:
1. Remove word "industrial corridor" from Sec. 10A(d)
2. Remove proposed amendment in Section 87 from the ordinance. All litigation to any affected party.
3. Prepare database of land holding with all registered companies in India including subsidiaries and shell companies.
This will resolve all issues related to land in India.
It will be interesting to see how many Foreign companies will line up for investment once ordinance is passes but before amendments to law is passed by the Parliament?
My Suggestion:
1. Remove word "industrial corridor" from Sec. 10A(d)
2. Remove proposed amendment in Section 87 from the ordinance. All litigation to any affected party.
3. Prepare database of land holding with all registered companies in India including subsidiaries and shell companies.
This will resolve all issues related to land in India.
Comments
Post a Comment