Challenges in Integrating Modern Technologies with People
Integrating Technologies and
Human Resources -– the biggest challenge for Supply Chain Companies
Integrating Technologies and
Human Resources -– the biggest challenge for Supply Chain Companies
By:
In modern trade regime, strong interdependence between various
activities of supply chain management and logistics management is witnessed. It
is thus difficult to identify precise boundaries. In other words there is a tendency
to oversimplify the supply chain issues or to make it too complicated by adding
too many issues, which are not required for efficient business operations.
In modern supply chain, these boundaries are continuously
moving to accommodate an integration of supply chain and logistics activities
depending upon the changing consumer expectations. In fact, it is suggested
that logistics is a sub-function of the supply chain. While logistics may be
involved to some extent in an increasing number of supply chain activities but
it can never be a part of the complete supply chain spectrum.
In practice, functions such as sourcing, manufacturing,
customer service and retailing involve logistics in their planning and
scheduling for optimizing the end-to-end supply chain, but their core
operations are somewhat different.
The Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals says
that “Supply Chain Management encompasses the planning and management of all
activities involved in sourcing and procurement, conversion, and all Logistics
Management activities. Importantly, it also includes coordination and
collaboration with channel partners, which can be suppliers, intermediaries,
third-party service providers, and customers.”
Supply Chain Management in order to be more effective should
integrate supply and demand management within and across companies. It is thus
integrating function is the primary responsibility of the head of business to ensure
effective linkages of major business functions and business processes within
and across companies into a cohesive and high performing business model.
It includes all of the logistics management activities as
well as manufacturing operations, and it drives coordination of processes and
activities within and across marketing, sales, product design, and finance
& information technology functions.
An increasingly important component to the supply chain
sector is the emergence of functional and process outsourcing, thus creating
the need for businesses (i.e. third party logistics providers, i.e. 3PLs) that
are specialized in providing complete set of logistics services. As a result, now
there is a well defined role for logistics/supply chain users and
logistics/supply chain service providers.
It is observed that the most common supply chain activities
completed in-house focus on inventory management and customer service,
including processing and executing orders. Conversely, the most common
outsourced activities focus on transportation of goods (i.e., outbound and
inbound transportation, and freight forwarding), customs (i.e., brokerage and
clearance) and, to a lesser degree, warehousing. In modern world many new
functions and dimensions can be added to the outsourcing basket to keep organization
lean.
According to the market estimates, the growth rate for this
market is about 20%, with the annual growth rate for warehousing, transportation
management, air/ocean freight forwarding, and dedicated carriage (four core
logistics sections) being 15% to 25%.
From a geographic perspective, the supply chain-oriented
organizations typically operate in multiple regions across the country and
internationally. Only a few operate in one region alone. Most of the regional
players have their specific territories to operate and they offer more than
just logistics support.
Internationally, the modern supply chain evolved in U.S.,
followed by Europe and Asia Pacific. In most companies the supply chain
function is generally centralized and headed by a senior manager.
Not only has the supply chain function evolved from strictly
storage and transportation to an active integration with many other supply
chain activities, but it is also shifting in terms of perception from being a
common cost centre to playing a strategic competitive role. The nature of work
in this sector is changing as the supply chain becomes more complicated and
strategic, and organizations try to manage the full supply chain, rather than
its individual parts.
Trends in Human Resource Management in Supply Chain:
In an increasingly integrated international market, issues
like global security, international trade, international competition and
border-crossing requirements are all affecting the supply chain sector, and are
expected to continue to do so over the next five to ten years. At the same time the supply chain management is facing increasing
complexity, financial/cost pressures, and increasing speed and quality
expectations.
Customers and competitors are exerting enormous pressure on
supply chain logistics. More specifically, the linkages between supplier
effectiveness, supply chain performance, and customer service have become
critical.
Challenge for
Supply Chain mangers:
Having improved manufacturing efficiency and product quality
in the past, suppliers now need to improve their collaboration with retailers
and customers in order to respect their delivery requirements. Increasing
customer expectations/demands, in terms of speed and quality, place an
increased focus on customer service.
The biggest challenge in technology adoption is mindset of decision
makers and managers and their attitude towards acting like power centers within
the organization and now willing to adopt a system which can require minimum
human interventions. Many decision makers
and managers are not willing to delegate their decision-making powers to
system-oriented approach.
In general, most of the organizations lag in both investment
and implementation of new technologies. While information management and
technology is one of the most common activities reported as falling under the
responsibility of the supply chain function, but this technology appears to be
under-utilized. The degree of technology use reported by much organization is
very often exaggerated or not utilized to their full potential. As a result the
use of ERPs is limited and stand-alone systems for specific functions are
common.
Adoption of Technology
is the key business driver:
Technology is clearly an important tool in any company's
efforts to respond to ever-increasing customers' expectations. Small and
medium-sized organizations cannot often afford the latest technologies required
to remain competitive in their respective markets. This is also one of the
reasons for growing acquisition and mergers in the supply chain sector.
Consequently, there has been a widespread increase in the number of third-party
service providers, as well as their reliance on contemporary information system
services.
Technology and the resulting information management
requirements are identified as key business drivers currently impacting the
supply chain function.
Successful Technology adoption will decide the existence:
Information management systems and related technology have
evolved at a more rapid pace and have had a more profound impact on job design
and skill requirements than process and production technology. Unfortunately, most
of the organizations are not prepared for the level of technological
integration that is required to compete successfully.
Technology is most commonly employed for inventory and
warehousing management. Looking forward decision makers should consider employing
technology for transportation. These technologies can also be used to manage customer
and supplier relationship management. Not surprisingly, larger organizations
have implemented more supply chain-related information systems than smaller
ones.
Unskilled
manpower hurts technology adoption process:
Interestingly, despite the number of organizations that
indicate that technology is applied in their organization, few indicate that
they currently have the requisite skills to fully employ technology.
Organizations want to continuously update their technology
to improve efficiency, but their ability to keep pace with technological change
is a challenge. The introduction of technology is changing the nature of work
for all occupational categories (i.e., managerial as well as operational
manpower). They are changing in terms of increased pace of work with less lead
time and more real-time information. The growing information needs also demands
increased requirement to manage this influx of diversified information.
As a result of technological change, software application
and analytical and decision-making skills are rapidly replacing traditional
manual processes and abilities. It appears that many employees have been able
to adapt to this evolution, other needs encouragement to do so.
There are divergent views with respect to whether existing employees
possess technically adaptable skills or not. Decision makers often say that
their employees do not have the requisite technical skills but employees on the
other hand indicate that they are not provided with adequate training to make
full use of technology.
Unfortunately academic institutions and training organizations
do not have technically competent staff for teaching with practical exposure in
the areas where employers employ technology.
In the short term, Employers are dealing with these skill
gaps by focusing on in-house and on-the-job training. In the longer term, it is
essential to have collaborative effort for technical skill development by
creating industry and academic institution alliances.
Going forward in market place, as a result of technology
introduction, it is anticipated that there will be further emphasis on the
importance of instantaneous adaptation to customer requirements, information
management and general management skills. If competitors are offering instant service,
can you afford to adopt a system which is not responsive to customer needs?
Missing link is effective trainers with diversified
practical knowledge:
Based on my interaction with many supply chain managers in
many companies and after studying their supply chain systems and people
involved in the system, it is clear that the training components are either ill
conceived or improperly executed.
One of the reasons given is that most of their trainers have
no experience of operating issues in supply chain management and how to make
technology adoption user friendly. Many experts make things complicated in
place of making them simple for adoption.
Most of the trainers, due to their own ignorance of working
environment, either discuss concepts or features of technology but very rarely
understand or explain the human side of business of supply chain, practical
issues and their integration with technology. Many trainers don’t prefer to customize
their training programs due to lack of their own understanding of the new
environment.
In author's view, effective training is vital for smoother
adoption of technology under given constraints. In modern world, it is the responsibility
of the trainer to motivate trainees to adopt new skills and environment.
Comments
Post a Comment