Gandhi Special - Can 'Hungry India' ensure 'Clean India'?
Gandhi Special:
Can 'Hungry India' ensure 'Clean India'?
Read and Share it to seek views of your friends and well-wishers.
India's ranking in Global Hunger Index is worse today than it was 15 years ago.
Today all media hype
is around clean India, no one is talking about Hungry India. The major root
cause of all social evils and crime is hunger. Why there is no hype to discuss this
vital aspect of society.
India is not in a
respected position in Hunger Index and no political leader is keen to discuss
this in public forum.
The International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) makes the annual calculations of GHI. Basing its readings on the most recent data, the 2016 GHI for India was derived from the fact that an estimated 15% population is undernourished - lacking in adequate food intake, both in quantity and quality.
Where India stands under present government?
The share of under-5 children who are `wasted' is about 15% while the share of children who are `stunted' is a staggering 39%. This reflects widespread and chronic lack of balanced food. The under-5 mortality rate is 4.8% in India, partially reflecting the fatal synergy of inadequate nutrition and unhealthy environments.
India continues to
have serious levels of widespread hunger forcing it to be ranked a lowly 97
among 118 developing countries for which the Global Hunger Index (GHI) was
calculated this year.
Our neighbours are all ranked above us:
Countries worse than
India include extremely poor African countries such as Niger, Chad, Ethiopia
and Sierra Leone besides two of India's neighbours: Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Other neighbours Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Nepal and China are all ranked above
India.
Although India runs two of the world's biggest children's nutrition programmes, the ICDS for children under 6 years and the mid-day meal programme for school going kids up to the age of 14, malnutrition continues to haunt India.
This clearly indicates poor planning and massive corruption in the system.
The GHI is
calculated by taking into account four key parameters: shares of undernourished
population, wasted and stunted children aged under 5, and infant mortality rate
of the same age group.
Of the 131 countries
studied, data was available for 118 countries. This year, for the first time,
two measures of child hunger - wasting and stunting - have been used to give a
more complete picture. Wasting refers to low weight in relation to a child's
height, reflecting acute undernutrition. Stunting refers to the deficiency in
height in relation to age, reflecting chronic undernutrition.
Endemic poverty, unemployment,
lack of sanitation and safe drinking water, and lack of effective healthcare
are main factors for the sorry state. Compared with previous years, marked
improvement has taken place in child stunting and under-5 mortality rates but
the proportion of undernourished people has declined only marginally from 17%
in 2000 to the current 15%. The share of wasted children has inched down
similarly.
India was ranked 83
in 2000 and 102 in 2008 with GHI scores of 38.2 and 36 respectively. This
implies that, while hunger levels in India have diminished somewhat, the
improvement has been outstripped by several other countries. Hence India's
ranking is worse today than it was 15 years ago. In fact, Bangladesh was ranked
84 with a score of 38.5 in 2000, just below India. But in 2016, it has improved
beyond India with a GHI score of 27.1 and a rank of 90 to India's 97.
Overall, global
hunger levels are down by about 29% compared to 2000. Twenty countries,
including Rwanda, Cambodia, and Myanmar, have reduced their GHI scores by over
50% each since 2000. And, for the second year in a row, no developing country
for which data was available featured in the "extremely alarming" category.
When Indian political leaders and opinion leaders will have their priorities right? How long it will take?
Many intellectually will try to argue that both can go parallel, I want to see the priority in resource poor country like India. If both can go parallel, whey there in no hype in media to discuss about Hunger Status.
Are we feeling ashamed to discuss this in public? If yes. It is more the reason we must make Hunger elimination as national priority over anything else.
Comments
Post a Comment