Food Laws & Policies
For more articles on this topic, pl. go to home page and search for "Food Laws"
Emerging Food Regulations Market and Challenges for Agribusinesses and Food Industries
Vijay Sardana & Priyanka Sardana
This article appeared in Processed Food Industry Magazine
New
Food Safety and Standards Act of India is now notified and work on
formulation of regulations is almost over. Readers are requested to go
through the articles carefully so that you can actively participate in
the rule making process to protect their legitimate interest keeping in
mind overall objective to deliver safe and wholesome foods to consumers
without compromising on other important issues like environment and
workers and animal welfare.
Growth
of agriculture and food trade around the world has increased the chance
of spread of infection and contamination around the world. The recent
incidences of Bird Flu, Swine Flu and Melamine contamination has raised
these issues to a higher level.
Sanitary
(human and animal health) and phytosanitary (plant health) standards
are necessary to ensure that food is safe for consumers, to prevent the
spread of pests and diseases among animals & plants and to ensure
fair practices in trade.
In
recent years the world food trade has been profoundly altered with the
emergence of WTO and other international treaties and Free Trade
Agreements (FTAs). They provide a more precise framework for trade
between countries, and also define the rights and the obligations of all
partners involved in the trade. These agreements are also served to
strengthen the status of institutions like the Codex Alimentarius
Commission, Office of Animal Health and the International Plant
Protection Convention since these were used as a basis for harmonization
to facilitate world trade.
The WTO, Uruguay Round Agreements and Agriculture
The
Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations, which was concluded
in 1994, established the World Trade Organization (WTO) to replace the
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). The Uruguay Round
negotiations were the first to deal with the liberalization of trade in
agricultural products, an area excluded from previous rounds of
negotiations. They also included negotiations on reducing non-tariff
barriers to international trade in agricultural products and concluded
with two binding agreements:
- The Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS Agreement)
- The Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Agreement).
Members of WTO will apply these agreements and the general terms are also applicable to countries that are not WTO members.
Agreement on the Application of SPS Measures
The
Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures
confirms the right of WTO member countries to apply measures necessary
to protect the life and health of humans, animals and plants. Agreement
on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS):
- ..says that measures (laws, regulations, and procedures) adopted by governments to protect animal, plant, or human health should not be maintained without sufficient scientific evidence.
- ..requires that WTO members base their national requirements on international standards, guidelines and other recommendations adopted by the FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius Commission, the IPPC (International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) and International Office of Epizootics where they exist.
Important Clauses of SPS Agreements:
SPS
agreement sets rules in an area previously excluded from GATT
disciplines. The purpose of the SPS Agreement is to ensure that measures
established by governments to protect human, animal and plant life and
health (in the agricultural sector only) are consistent with
requirements prohibiting arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination in
trade between countries where the same conditions prevail.
- It also attempts to establish that these measures are not disguised restrictions on international trade.
- The SPS requires that, with regard to food safety measures, WTO members base their national requirements on international standards, guidelines and other recommendations adopted by the FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC), where they exist.
- This does not prevent a member country from adopting stricter measures, if there is scientific justification for doing so or if the level of protection afforded by the Codex standard is inconsistent with the level of protection generally applied and deemed appropriate by the country concerned.
- The SPS Agreement covers all food hygiene and food safety measures including control of pesticides and other chemicals. In addition, it covers plant quarantine measures.
- The SPS Agreement recognizes the IPPC (International Plant Protection Convention) as the relevant international organization responsible for the establishment of international standards for phytosanitary measures and encourages countries to base their phytosanitary measures on IPPC standards, guidelines or recommendations to promote global harmonization of phytosanitary measures in trade.
- The SPS Agreement recognizes the International Office of Epizootics as the organization to set benchmarks for meeting SPS requirements related to animal health. The WTO Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures guides this work.
- The SPS Agreement states that any measures taken that conform to international Codex Standards, guidelines or other recommendations are deemed to be appropriate, necessary and non-discriminatory. Furthermore, the SPS Agreement calls for a programme of harmonization of national requirements based on international standards
Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)
- Agreement on TBT is designed to check deception and economic fraud.
- Agreement on TBT seeks to ensure that technical regulations and analytical procedures for assessing conformity with technical regulations and standards do not create unnecessary obstacles to trade.
- The Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade was established with the objective of preventing the use of national or regional technical requirements, or standards in general, as unjustified barriers to trade.
- The TBT agreement covers standards relating to all types of products including industrial and agricultural products. Please note, what TBT Agreement does not cover are food standards related to sanitary and phytosanitary measures.
Major Clauses of TBT agreement covers the following aspects-
It
includes numerous measures designed to protect consumers against
deception and economic fraud. Examples of food standards covered by the
TBT Agreement are those related to quality and labeling.
The
TBT Agreement basically provides that all technical standards and
regulations must have a legitimate purpose and that the impact or cost
of implementing a standard must be proportional to the purpose of the
standard. It also says that if there are two or more ways of achieving
the same objective, the least trade-restrictive alternative should be
followed.
The
agreement also places emphasis on international standards and WTO
members are obliged to use international standards or parts of these
standards except where the international standard would be ineffective
or inappropriate in the national situation.
It is also important to note that the TBT Agreement does not include a programme for harmonizing national standards.
Changing Food Regulations in India
When
Government of India through Food Safety and Standards Authority under
the Food Safety and Standards Act is in the process of developing food
standards, it is important for all the stakeholders to know more about
how standards are set globally. It is important for stakeholders to know
what are the important provisions and criteria in food standards
setting process.
Global Reference for Food and related Standards
The
adoption of the SPS and TBT Agreements resulted in new emphasis and
importance being placed on the work of Codex in establishing
international food quality and safety standards.
Codex Alimentarius means a code of international food standards
The purpose of Codex is
- To guide and promote the elaboration of definitions and requirements for foods and assist in their harmonization
- To facilitate world trade
- To promote consumer protection
What is Codex Alimentarius and how it functions?
The name Codex Alimentarius is taken from Latin and translates literally as “food code” or “food law”.
The
Codex Alimentarius is a series of food standards, codes and other
regulations adopted by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) that
countries could use as models in their domestic food legislation and
regulations, and which could be applied to international trade. Codex
provides the assurance that any foods produced according to its codes of
hygienic practices and complying with its standards are safe and
nutritious and offer adequate health protection.
The
CAC was created in 1962 by two United Nations organizations, the Food
and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the World Health Organization
(WHO). Its main purpose is was to promote consumer protection and to
facilitate world trade in foods through the development of food
standards, codes of practice and other guidelines. Since its inception,
the CAC has been responsible for implementing the Joint FAO/WHO Food
Standards Programme. The CAC is an intergovernmental body with a current
membership of more than 180 member governments. Membership is open to
all Member Nations and Associate Members of FAO and WHO. In addition,
observers from international scientific, food industry, food trade and
consumer associations may attend sessions of the Commission and of its
subsidiary bodies. While observer organizations can fully participate in
the proceedings of the meeting, by statute, only Member governments can
participate in any decision process.
An
Executive Committee, six Regional Coordinating Committees and a
Secretariat assist the Commission in administering its work and other
activities. The work of the CAC is divided between two basic types of
committees. The first type deals with general subject matter(s) that
cuts across all food classes or groups. The work of the second type of
committee, the Codex Commodity Committees, is specific for foods within a
class or group. In addition, there are ad hoc Intergovernmental Codex
Task Forces, which were established to undertake specialized tasks. For
example, the 23rd Session of the CAC was held to develop standards,
guidelines and recommendations for foods derived from biotechnology, for
animal feeding and for fruit juices.
There
are nine general subject matter committees, each with different
responsibilities. These Committees deal with matters such as hygiene,
veterinary drugs, pesticides, food additives, labeling, methods of
analysis, nutrition, and import/export inspection and certification
systems. For example, one Committee is responsible for developing
standards, recommendations and guidelines related to microbiological
contamination (Codex Committee on Food Hygiene). This Committee also
develops general hygienic (sanitation) practices and conditions for food
manufacturing, processing, production, handling, storing and
transporting. The subject matter committees interact with the Commodity
Committees. For example, the Committee on Food Labeling proposes
standards for labeling and for specific labeling requirements of
commodities in co-operation with the specific commodity committees.
The
second type of Committee is one that deals with a specific type of food
class or group, such as dairy and dairy products, fats and oils, or
fishes and fish products. There are 17 Committees on specific subsectors
of food. Each works on a specific food or class of food. Since its
beginning, the CAC has adopted more than 200 different standards for
food in all of the main groups of food traded at the international
level. For example the Codex Committee on Fresh Fruits and Vegetables
has elaborated a number of standards for fresh fruits and vegetables
that primarily address quality issues.
Codes
of Practice provide guidance on acceptable manufacturing, food
processing and handling practices during production, transport and
storage. The CAC has elaborated various codes. Some of these have a
general application across food product classes or groups, while others
are specific for certain commodities or foods. These Codes serve as a
means of providing recommendations to producers and to government
regulatory organizations on specific Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs)
for the commodities they address. These Codes, when used appropriately,
can serve to enhance compliance with Codex standards and international
trading requirements.
Related
to contaminants, CAC has established guidelines for the maximum
tolerable levels for 25 common industrial and environmental contaminants
of foods. Food additive evaluations have resulted in establishing
acceptable use levels (with no appreciable health risk over a lifetime)
for 1300 additives used in food. The review of pesticides for approved
use in agricultural pest control resulted in the evaluation of 197
pesticide chemicals, and establishing 2516 maximum residue levels for
these pesticides in various foods. All Codex standards are developed
according to the same procedure. The CAC decides that a standard should
be developed and determines which subsidiary body should undertake the
work.
Subsidiary
bodies of the Commission also may make the decision to elaborate
standards, subject to the approval of the Commission or the Executive
Committee. The Secretariat of the Commission then arranges for the
preparation of a “proposed draft standard” which is circulated to the
Member countries for comments. The subsidiary body reviews and revises
the “proposed draft standard” in light of the comments received, and
then may present the text to the Commission as a “draft standard.” If
the Commission adopts the “draft standard,” it is again sent to Member
governments for further comments. In the light of the comments received
and after further consideration by the subsidiary body concerned, the
Commission reconsiders the draft and may adopt it as a “Codex standard”.
Need for Harmonization
Harmonization means establishing national measures consistent with international standards, guidelines and recommendations.
To
facilitate international trade, it has been necessary for efforts to be
made to harmonize food standards. Those involved in harmonization
efforts recognized that countries have the right to adopt standards they
feel are appropriate to protect human, animal and plant health and the
environment. They also have the right to take the steps necessary to
assure these standards are met. However, preventing these standards from
becoming barriers to trade is important to promote trade between
countries.
The
TBT Agreement does not specifically name the international standard
setting bodies whose standards are to be used as benchmarks for judging
compliance with the provisions of the Agreement. However, the SPS
Agreement specifically names the CAC as the only recognized
international food standard setting body. The fact that the Codex
Alimentarius is designated in the SPS Agreement indicates the value
given to the Codex Standards in the negotiations of the Agreements and
this spills over into the areas covered by the TBT Agreement.
National
regulations that are consistent with Codex meet the requirements of SPS
and TBT Agreements. When joining the WTO, countries agree to adhere to a
number of agreements including the SPS and TBT Agreements. These two
agreements set the standards necessary to assure the regulation of food
quality and safety in international food trade. WTO Member governments
agree to use Codex standards as their reference. As Codex standards have
the full support of the SPS Agreement that advocates them as the basis
for all national standards, they play a significant role in the
harmonization of national food safety standards and may be used as a
reference point for resolving trade disputes between WTO Members.
What Indian food Industry should do?
Readers
are advised to keep close watch on developments and notifications
issued by Food Safety and Standards Authority and send their comments so
that while finalizing the views your views can be considered by the
authority. This will help in developing effective food regulatory system
in India, which will help Indian food industry to grow in global
markets besides improving the market share by winning consumer
confidence in domestic food market.
Comments
Post a Comment